REAL CASE 033
Nongfu Spring's Water Grew Only About 2.1%—So How Did Group Revenue Still Grow Around 16%?
What should a company do when its brand has long been closely identified with one core product category and that category suddenly suffers a trust shock?
The most obvious answer might be:
Put everything into restoring the core product.
Nongfu Spring did not do only that.
Packaged water remained important. The company still needed to protect consumer trust, maintain distribution, and repair its core business. But the national distribution system built through water had another important value:
It could sell other beverages.
That is the central idea in Case 033.
Nongfu Spring spent years building its brand through packaged water. Consumers could find the product in convenience stores, supermarkets, restaurants, and many other retail outlets. This high distribution density became a commercial asset in its own right.
Building that asset is difficult.
The company needs water sources, factories, packaging, warehousing, transportation, distributors, retail relationships, and long-term brand investment so that consumers will choose its products on the shelf.
Once that system exists, it does not have to serve only one bottle of water.
The same retail outlet can carry Nongfu Spring water and Oriental Leaf.
The same distributor network can deliver water and tea.
The same manufacturing and supply-chain organization can support multiple beverage categories.
The infrastructure originally built around packaged water can therefore become the starting point for growth in tea.
The 2024 trust shock made this capability much more important.
If Nongfu Spring had only one meaningful growth engine, pressure on packaged water would expose the entire Group to the same category risk.
Instead, the company continued defending water while allowing tea to take on more responsibility.
Oriental Leaf became particularly important because it was no longer simply another beverage sold alongside water. It increasingly became a product line capable of making a meaningful contribution to Group growth.
In 2025, Group revenue reached approximately RMB52.6 billion, up roughly 22.5%.
In 1H 2026, Group revenue reached approximately RMB29.7 billion, up around 16%.
But packaged water grew only about 2.1%.
These figures must be read together.
Looking only at 16% Group growth could create the impression that every category was expanding rapidly.
That was not the case.
Looking only at 2.1% packaged-water growth could create the opposite impression that Nongfu Spring had lost its ability to grow.
That was not the case either.
What actually changed was the source of growth.
Water remained an important foundation, while tea and adjacent beverage categories took on a larger share of the growth burden.
That is the value of product mix.
A national distribution network that can sell only one product has limited resilience.
If the same system can repeatedly bring new products with genuine consumer demand into existing retail channels, distribution itself becomes a reusable growth asset.
This does not mean Nongfu Spring can ignore packaged water.
Water still provides major consumer reach, brand recognition, and channel presence. If trust in packaged water were to weaken for a prolonged period, the effect could extend beyond the water category and damage the broader brand.
The correct strategy is therefore not "replace water with tea."
It is:
**Repair water while allowing tea to become a second engine.**
Both must happen together.
Nongfu Spring must continue protecting water sources, quality, brand trust, and distribution while using Oriental Leaf and other products to expand consumption occasions.
This also reduces category-concentration risk.
Historically, consumers primarily associated Nongfu Spring with water.
If the brand increasingly becomes associated with water, tea, and other beverage categories, dependence on one category becomes lower.
But the second engine also carries risk.
Strong tea growth does not mean the category can grow at the same rate forever. Competition can intensify, consumer preferences can change, channel inventory can build, and competitors can imitate successful products.
The company therefore should not replace dependence on water with dependence on tea.
The more durable capability is:
**Use brand, manufacturing, and national distribution repeatedly to turn consumer demand into a broader product portfolio.**
That is the deeper value of Nongfu Spring's system.
The 2024 shock tested the brand.
The 2025–2026 results tested whether the business system had another route to growth.
As of September 12, 2026, it did.
That is why the Outcome is Success.
Not because packaged water returned to every previous high-growth level, but because Group revenue could still grow around 16% while the core water category grew only about 2.1%.
ChinaFood / Packaged Drinking Water / Tea Beverages / Beverage Manufacturing / National DistributionSuccessWhy Nongfu Spring did not devote all of its resources only to restoring packaged water after the category suffered a trust shock, but instead continued repairing water while allowing Oriental Leaf and other beverages to become larger growth engines.Group revenue was approximately RMB52.6 billion in 2025, up roughly 22.5%. In 1H 2026, revenue reached approximately RMB29.7 billion, up around 16%, while packaged-water growth was only about 2.1%. This case examines how a brand built through packaged water used national distribution, manufacturing, and consumer access to turn a second beverage category into a meaningful source of growth.
Full Analysis
Nongfu Spring's first Turning Point was building a national brand and dense distribution system through packaged drinking water. Water generated revenue, but it also gave the company access to convenience stores, supermarkets, restaurants, and other retail outlets across China.
The second Turning Point was the 2024 trust shock. It exposed the risk of allowing one core category to define too much of the company's growth and consumer identity.
The third and most important Turning Point was management's decision not to require packaged water to carry the entire recovery. Oriental Leaf and other tea beverages were allowed to become genuine growth engines.
By 1H 2026, the change was visible in the revenue structure. Group revenue grew around 16%, while packaged water grew only about 2.1%. The gap shows that growth was increasingly coming from a broader product portfolio.
The strategic shift was therefore not that water became unimportant. It was that Nongfu Spring accepted a broader identity: a company whose foundation was built through water, but whose future growth could come from multiple beverage categories.
Turning Point
Nongfu Spring's first Turning Point was building a national brand and dense distribution system through packaged drinking water. Water generated revenue, but it also gave the company access to convenience stores, supermarkets, restaurants, and other retail outlets across China.
The second Turning Point was the 2024 trust shock. It exposed the risk of allowing one core category to define too much of the company's growth and consumer identity.
The third and most important Turning Point was management's decision not to require packaged water to carry the entire recovery. Oriental Leaf and other tea beverages were allowed to become genuine growth engines.
By 1H 2026, the change was visible in the revenue structure. Group revenue grew around 16%, while packaged water grew only about 2.1%. The gap shows that growth was increasingly coming from a broader product portfolio.
The strategic shift was therefore not that water became unimportant. It was that Nongfu Spring accepted a broader identity: a company whose foundation was built through water, but whose future growth could come from multiple beverage categories.
Before vs After
BEFORE
Before 2020, Nongfu Spring already had a recognizable operating model. Own brands, source water and beverage production, then distribute packaged drinks through a national retail network. The economic engine is brand, distribution density and high-volume manufacturing. That starting point matters because the pandemic did not create the economics of the company; it exposed them. Businesses with high fixed cost, inventory exposure or long contractual obligations reacted differently from marketplace, franchise or fee models.
A good baseline asks three questions. First, who pays the company and for what unit? Second, which costs arrive before revenue is certain? Third, how much capital is required to add the next unit of growth? Those questions make later strategic choices comparable across years rather than treating every management presentation as a new story.
The six-year sequence is the spine of the case. After listing, Nongfu Spring faced a sharp packaged-water setback in 2024, followed by a 2025 recovery led by tea and other beverages. In 1H 2026 water growth was modest while tea remained the more dynamic growth engine.
The period should not be read as a smooth trend. 2020 changed customer behavior and capital markets; 2021 rewarded growth; 2022 exposed inflation, rates or operating stress; 2023–2024 forced many companies to choose between retrenchment and renewed expansion; 2025–2026 show which changes became durable. For Nongfu Spring, the decisive point is not the calendar year itself but the moment management could no longer rely on the old growth assumption.AFTER
The evidence through the cutoff is: 2025 revenue was about RMB52.6 billion, up roughly 22.5%. 1H 2026 revenue reached about RMB29.7 billion, up around 16%, while packaged-water growth was only about 2.1%.
These figures must be interpreted in context. A high growth rate can come from acquisitions or a depressed comparison; a low growth rate can still be attractive if margins, cash flow or partner economics improve. The most useful comparison is therefore between the operating model before the strategic change and the economics after it.
The result type for this case is **success**. That label is descriptive, not moral. It summarizes the state of the strategy at the cutoff and should not be read as a prediction of what will happen after September 2026.
The major risks are: Brand trust, social-media shocks, category concentration, source-water regulation, channel inventory and the possibility that tea growth slows after an unusually strong period.
There is also a measurement risk. Public disclosures differ by accounting standard, geography and business model. Some companies publish rich quarterly operating metrics; private or post-bankruptcy companies publish far less. Missing data should not be filled with invented precision.
Finally, this case has a hard information cutoff of 12 September 2026. Events after that date may change the conclusion, but they are outside this case and should not be smuggled backward into the analysis.
GoGoUp Five Powers
Discover5/5
Nongfu Spring initially discovered that packaged water could become a powerful mass-market business through brand trust, source perception, and national availability.
The second discovery was that national distribution itself had cross-category value. A network capable of putting water into large numbers of convenience stores, supermarkets, and other outlets could also carry tea and other beverages.
After the 2024 shock, the third discovery became more important: when the core category is under pressure, the company does not have to wait for that category to recover completely before growing again. A second category with genuine consumer demand can use the same network to scale.
Moving from "sell water effectively" to "use the same distribution system to support multiple beverage engines" supports a Discover score of 5.
Analyze5/5
Nongfu Spring cannot be analyzed only through Group revenue growth or only through packaged-water growth.
In 1H 2026, Group revenue was approximately RMB29.7 billion, up around 16%, while packaged water grew only about 2.1%. Looking only at Group growth could create the false impression that every category was growing rapidly. Looking only at water could underestimate the contribution from tea and other beverages.
The correct analysis asks where growth is coming from.
Channel inventory, product mix, manufacturing utilization, and brand trust also matter. A beverage manufacturer produces physical products and sells them through distributors and retailers. If channel inventory becomes excessive, strong shipments today can create pressure later.
Revenue mix, category growth, and channel quality therefore need to be analyzed together. Analyze receives 5.
Execute5/5
Nongfu Spring's execution was not simply launching a successful tea product. The company had to make a second category work through infrastructure originally built at large scale around water.
It needed to continue protecting water sources, quality, brand trust, and distribution while simultaneously expanding Oriental Leaf and other products through manufacturing, warehousing, logistics, distributors, and retail outlets.
The challenge is to do both without sacrificing either side. Packaged water still requires consumer confidence and channel support, while tea requires product innovation, marketing, production capacity, and shelf space.
The difference between Group growth and packaged-water growth in 2025–2026 shows that the product-mix strategy had produced real operating results rather than remaining a strategic statement.
Therefore, Execute receives 5.
Decide5/5
Nongfu Spring's most important decision was not to interpret the 2024 water shock as meaning that every available resource had to be redirected back into packaged water.
Doing so might have protected the core category while preserving the same concentration risk.
Instead, the company pursued two paths simultaneously. Water remained essential because it supported the brand and distribution foundation. Tea was allowed to become more than an adjacent product and take on genuine growth responsibility.
This decision involved an opportunity cost. Investing more heavily behind tea meant accepting that Nongfu Spring's future would no longer be defined only by packaged water.
But it also reduced dependence on one category.
The gap between roughly 16% Group revenue growth and about 2.1% packaged-water growth in 1H 2026 provides evidence supporting that decision.
Therefore, Decide receives 5.
Create5/5
Nongfu Spring's original major creation was a system combining water sources, brand, manufacturing, and national distribution into a high-frequency mass-market consumer business.
The next creation is upgrading that infrastructure from a "packaged-water system" into a broader multi-category beverage platform.
Oriental Leaf and other tea products did not need to build national distribution from zero. They could use existing manufacturing, logistics, distributor relationships, and retail access to reach consumers more quickly.
The durable creation is therefore not replacing water with tea. It is building a commercial system capable of carrying multiple beverage categories.
If brand trust, product innovation, and distribution efficiency remain strong, this platform can reduce dependence on any single category.
Therefore, Create receives 5.
Key Takeaway
Nongfu Spring shows that the real value of a powerful distribution network is not simply selling more of the original product. It is the ability to help a second category scale when the core category comes under pressure.
Group revenue reached approximately RMB52.6 billion in 2025, up roughly 22.5%. In 1H 2026, Group revenue reached approximately RMB29.7 billion, up around 16%, while packaged-water growth was only about 2.1%.
These figures show that the source of growth changed. Packaged water remained important, but Oriental Leaf and other tea beverages were carrying meaningful responsibility as a second growth engine.
The first transferable rule is:
**A core category does not have to carry the entire recovery after a shock.**
If a company already owns strong brand, manufacturing, and distribution capabilities, adjacent categories can use the same infrastructure to create new growth.
The second rule is:
**Distribution is a reusable asset across products.**
The same distributors, logistics routes, and retail outlets can reduce the difficulty of scaling a new category.
The third rule is to avoid replacing one concentration risk with another. Strong tea growth does not mean the company should make its future entirely dependent on tea. A more durable system allows multiple categories to share brand, manufacturing, and distribution.
As of September 12, 2026, Nongfu Spring had demonstrated that after pressure on packaged water, the Group could still maintain strong growth through tea and adjacent beverages. The Outcome is therefore Success.
Evidence / Sources
Public Evidence 1:
Source / Author:
Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.
Material:
2025 annual results and annual report
Facts supported:
2025 Group revenue was approximately RMB52.6 billion, up roughly 22.5%.
This supports the conclusion that the Group achieved a strong recovery after the earlier pressure on its core category.
Public Evidence 2:
Source / Author:
Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.
Material:
2026 interim results, August 25, 2026
Facts supported:
1H 2026 Group revenue was approximately RMB29.7 billion, up around 16%, while packaged-water growth was approximately 2.1%.
These figures support the conclusion that total Group growth was materially stronger than packaged-water growth and that other beverage categories were carrying a larger share of growth.
Public Evidence 3:
Source / Author:
Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd.
Material:
2025 annual report, 2026 interim report, and investor disclosures available through September 12, 2026
Facts supported:
The company continued operating its packaged-water business while expanding tea and other beverage categories through its established manufacturing, distributor, and national retail network.
These materials support the analysis of "repair water while developing a second growth engine."
Internal Verification Notes:
Research cutoff date: September 12, 2026.
2025 Group revenue: approximately RMB52.6 billion, up roughly 22.5%.
1H 2026 Group revenue: approximately RMB29.7 billion, up around 16%.
1H 2026 packaged-water growth: approximately 2.1%.
Do not describe approximately 16% Group revenue growth as packaged-water growth. Packaged water grew only about 2.1%.
Do not describe the Group as having stopped growing because packaged-water growth was relatively low. Total Group growth was materially stronger than water growth.
Do not state that Oriental Leaf or tea has completely replaced packaged water. The correct interpretation is that tea became a more important second growth engine.
Do not claim that the 2024 brand and trust shock has been permanently resolved. Brand trust and core water performance still require monitoring.
Do not assume that strong tea growth can continue indefinitely at the same rate.
Do not ignore channel-inventory risk. Beverage manufacturing and distribution require attention to distributor inventory, retail sell-through, and production discipline.
Success in this case means that after significant pressure on the core packaged-water category, Nongfu Spring used its brand, manufacturing, and national distribution capabilities to make tea and adjacent beverages larger contributors to growth and restore strong Group-level performance.
Statements such as "distribution is reusable across products," "the core category does not have to carry the entire recovery," and "a second growth engine reduces category-concentration risk" are GoGoUp educational analysis.
The Discover, Analyze, Execute, Decide, and Create scores and commentary are GoGoUp educational assessments, not official Nongfu Spring ratings.
This case is intended for business and entrepreneurship education and does not constitute investment advice.